object_number
569
Edo designations
English designations
Pendant Mask
Categories
Ceremonial Regalia
Location
Norfolk Road, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
Loading...
Pendant Mask
Pendant Mask

Provenance

4 events
Production
unknown to February 22, 1897 (day approximate)
The object was produced by Unknown member(s) of the Igun-Ẹrọnmwọn guild in Benin City.
Looted
February 22, 1897 (day approximate) to June 1899 (year approximate)
The object was looted by Unknown member of the British colonial military campaign on Benin - February 1897 from Benin Kingdom.
Auction
July 1974
The object was auctioned to Lisa & Robert Sainsbury through Sotheby's in London.
Donation
1974
The object was donated by Lisa & Robert Sainsbury to the Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts from Great Britain to Norwich.

Related archival documents

1 documents
See all
An archival document representing a Auction Catalog of 124 page(s)
Auction Catalogue
Metropolitan Museum of Art
Thomas J. Watson Library sales and auction catalogues
Date
July 8, 1974

Institution data

Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts
The data was transferred directly by the institution.
Last updated: 2021-08-02
Language: english
Institution fieldValue
object_number
object id
569
title
designation
object type
Mask of a cow
description
description
Mask of a cow. West Africa, Nigeria: Benin. Mid 18th century. Bronze. h. 24.1 x w 29.7 x d. 6.4 cm. Acquired 1974. Robert and Lisa Sainsbury Collection. UEA 569
free_field.content
description
JA4373MH-569Polaroids in cons file569a1569a2This cow mask displays downward sloping horns, with two small ears on the side of the head. The ears are hollow for about two thirds of their length and are supported by integral rods. There is floral-like patterning to the face and horns, and vertical geometric patterning to the top of the head. There is some damage to the top right of the facial area and faults in casting show several ‘burn in' repairs. (VADS Helen Coleman) This cow mask may have some connection with a kind of reredos which can be seen at the back of some of the photographs (Fagg, 1970) of the royal ancestor altars ( which are believed to surmount the deceased king's burial chamber). On this reredos are carved stylised cow's heads at intervals of about a yard. The reference must be to the prime sacrificial animal in the descending series at the Oba's annual Igue (the worship of his head), the cow being the penultimate offering before human sacrifice until the of 1897 brought that part of the ritual to an end. When it came to those last two sacrifices, a sheet was raised between the Oba and the victims, since he was strictly forbidden to see them, though fully responsible for their deaths. Nowadays, the delicacy of this arrangement is commemorated by the raising of the sheet for the most important animal to be sacrificed. In 1958 Oba Akenzua II had a cow tethered in full sight of the populace, but a ram was sacrificed instead. The arabesque decorations on the animal's face are normally a mark of pieces believed to have been made during the Eresonyen revival of bronze- casting (1735-50), though they were introduced in the Middle Period as a decoration on clothes, especially those of Europeans. This pendant, which is perhaps unique in its form, is an excellent example of the work of the Iguneromwon (bronze-casters' guild) under Eresonyen. It is a technically adventurous, perhaps even 'one-off' piece of bronze-casting, despite indications that the caster may perhaps have overreached himself- as evidenced by the gap between the ears and several 'burn-in' repairs. In a straightforward piece of lost-wax casting, a wax model is made on a clay core which is then encased in a clay investment, complete with casting vents; the wax is melted out and molten bronze is poured in till the mould is fill. If there is insufficient metal, or an air pocket develops, the casting will be somewhat deficient. Here, the artist attempted a somewhat ambitious task; the horns and ears would have posed problems in the casting flow. When making a 'burn-in' repair, a wax mould of the deficient areas is made to fill the gaps in the casting; the whole is re-encased in a clay investment and the casting process is repeated. Sometimes the repair is virtually unnoticeable from the outside, but traces on the inside are clearer. The horns are complete at the back; there are nail holes for suspension behind each ear, and the ears are supported by integral rods. (Margret Carey. In: Steven Hooper (ed.), 1997, Catalogue to the Robert and Lisa Sainsbury Collection. University of East Anglia.)
material
material
Bronze
dimension.free
dimensions
h. 24.1 x w 29.7 x d. 6.4 cm
dimension.type
dimensions
HeightWidthDepth
dimension.unit
dimensions
mmmmmm
object_category
object type
Mask3D
inscription.content
inscriptions
Collection identification and object number
inscription.method
inscriptions
Silversafe paper coated and adhered with Paraloid B72
inscription.notes
inscriptions
Pre-2001
inscription.type
inscriptions
Object number label
inscription.type.lref
inscriptions
1778
acquisition.source
prior source
collection
prior source
Robert and Lisa Sainsbury Collection
owner_hist.notes
prior source
provenance
acquisition.notes
provenance
Benin City was the principal settlement of the Edo Kingdom of Benin, situated in the south of Nigeria. In February 1897 the city was attacked by British military, ending the ruling indigenous administration, and the Oba (King) Ovonramwen Nogbaisi (reigned 1888–1897) was exiled. The city was destroyed along with its Royal Palaces. The royal regalia and important religious and memorial sculptures that survived the raid, were looted by the combined forces of British Royal marines and other colonial forces. The Oba’s son, Aiguobasinwin Ovonramwen, Eweka II (reigned 1914-1933) returned to Benin City in 1914, restored the city and Palace complex and the Oba dynasty continues today as a regional and cultural administration in Edo state, Nigeria. The number of artefacts taken in 1897 is believed to be around 2,500, which were shipped to the UK by the British Admiralty. About 40% of the objects were accessioned to the British Museum (700 works) and other works were given to individual military personnel. The remainder were sold at auction by the Admiralty to pay for the , for example, at Stevens Auction Rooms, 38 King Street, London, May 25, 1897, followed by several sales at William Downing Webster, Bicester, between 1898 and 1900. The artefacts are now dispersed across museum collections, notably in Europe and the USA. Provenance between 1897 and 1974 not known.Purchased by Robert Sainsbury at Sotheby’s sale of ‘ Art’, July 1974 Donated by Robert and Lisa Sainsbury to the University of East Anglia, 1974 (Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts)
credit_line
provenance
Donated by Robert and Lisa Sainsbury, 1978
cultural_group
ethnic attribution
Edo
acquisition.date
accession date
1974
acquisition.method
accession method
notes
notes
exhibition
exhibition history
exhibition.date.end
exhibition history
exhibition.date.start
exhibition history
exhibition.lref
exhibition history
exhibition.organiser
exhibition history
exhibition.person_responsible
exhibition history
exhibition.person_responsible.role
exhibition history
exhibition.venue
exhibition history
catalogue.illus_page
bibliography
156
catalogue.name
bibliography
Robert and Lisa Sainsbury Collection / edited by Steven Hooper
catalogue.name.lref
bibliography
7
catalogue.number
bibliography
119
catalogue.page
bibliography
156, 157
catalogue.volume
bibliography
2
current_owner
legal status
condition
condition
condition.lref
condition
acquisition.method.lref
acquisition.source.lref
collection.lref
297
cultural_group.lref
519
current_location.context
LA Screen 2 B
current_location.date
1/4/18
current_location.lref
1245
current_location.name
LA Screen 2 B
current_location.notes
(TH)
current_location.type
1
current_owner.lref
dimension.type.lref
678
dimension.unit.lref
999
dimension.value
25029764
documentation.author
documentation.place
documentation.publisher
documentation.shelfmark
documentation.staff_library
documentation.title
documentation.title.lref
documentation.year
edit.date
2020-08-122020-06-082020-06-082020-06-012020-06-012020-06-012020-05-182020-04-032019-06-03
edit.name
ruh16mruruh16mruruh16mruruh16mruruh16mruruh16mruawx19acuawx19acuxnx18rbu
edit.source
collect>interncollect>interncollect>interncollect>interncollect>interncollect>interncollect>interncollect>internCOLLECT>intern
edit.time
11:32:4910:36:4810:32:4913:22:3513:19:1111:54:0914:52:0611:15:1811:28:01
frame
Object mount
frame.notes
Hollow back
free_field.confidential
x
free_field.type
B/W NegB/W NegB/W NegTransparencyTransparency
input.date
2/4/02
input.name
g122
input.source
collect>intern
input.time
4:34:42 PM
label.date
label.source
label.text
label.type
material.lref
55
object_category.lref
3338815
owner_hist.date.start
Sensitive Content

Digital Benin collates digital material from institutions, and some of this material is inherently colonial and contains words, terms and phrases that are inaccurate, derogatory and harmful towards African and African diasporic communities. Catalogue transcriptions, book titles, exhibition titles and museum titles may contain harmful terms. We recognise the potential for the material to cause physical and mental distress as well as evoke strong emotions. Owing to the scale of the collection’s data, a process to implement sensitive-content warnings in the displayed data is still incomplete. The material within the catalogue does not represent Digital Benin’s views. Digital Benin maintains a strong anti-colonial, anti-racist position and affirms its support for centring the humanity of historically marginalised and disenfranchised communities. Read more about the background of this statement here